Well it’s once again been a busy week on teh internets machine, hasn’t it? I am finding it difficult to make the time to both read and write about it all. A more cynical person might say here that some people in power are liking that just fine — the busier we are, the less time we have to think about things like, oh, I don’t know: war?
Rather than pontificate about any one story in this news, I think this morning I’ll just pass along some good reading that I’ve stumbled across in the last few days. Such as:
Oh yes he did! In fact, “Newt Gingrich’s 527 group sent a letter to porn exec Allison Vivas Wednesday telling her she’d won their “Entrepreneur of the Year” award and inviting her to an “intimate event” with Gingrich.”
From our pretend girlfriend Rachel Maddow’s tweets (yes, I stalk her teh twitter. so?), we get:
Which includes some pretty interesting stuff, including: ” Compared with the employer-coverage group, people in the Medicare group report fewer problems obtaining medical care, less financial hardship due to medical bills, and higher overall satisfaction with their coverage. Although access and bill payment problems increased across the board from 2001 to 2007, the gap between Medicare and private employer coverage widened.”
Meanwhile,you may have heard about a new Census Bureau report that finds more Americans live at or below the poverty level. Truth is, it’s even worse than the report’s findings:
“… [T]he official poverty measure does not reveal the full degree of financial hardship and dislocation caused by the current downturn in the economy, says [Douglas J.] Besharov, a professor of public policy and director of the Welfare Reform Academy at Maryland. The official measure fails to capture the massive job, income, and wealth losses among the lower-middle and middle classes.”
Always a good read, Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo always takes political analysis one step deeper than the rest. So it’s refreshing to read his take on Politico‘s pseudo analysis:
“I’m seeing the Politico tell me that the Republicans are in danger of having their public profile dominated by cranks on the fringe right.”
Go read it, it’s short.
If you’re thinking of sightseeing in D.C. today, take a cue from the gray, rainy weather and don’t do it. Plus, there’s this:
That’s right a march on Washington. Or against President Obama, rather. I actually feel sorry for these teabagging marchers. Clearly they are scared and also, not very bright. They like to think that they are a part of a massive grassroots, populist movement, but of course, it’s not:
“However, most of the day-to-day organizing has been orchestrated by a now familiar set of lobbyists and Republican operatives who have helped plan anti-Obama “grassroots” tea party events since February. In addition, a set of far-right groups are supporting the event, bringing along self-described “American mob members” to join in on the Obama-bashing.”
On a different note, I just found out I have a new label: “agri-intellectual.” Who knew?
“The sustainable-food movement needs to step up and start grappling with big questions. I’ve said for a while that I see three big challenges for the sustainable-food movement as it scales up: 1) soil fertility—in the absence of synthesized nitrogen and mined phosphorous and potassium, how are we to build soil fertility on a larger scale?; 2) labor—sustainable farming requires more hands on the ground; who’s going to work our farm fields, and at what wages?; and 3) access—in an economy built on long-term wage stagnation, how can we make sustainably grown food accessible to everyone?”
Germany has an exciting election coming up, you know. Or not.
“German Chancellor Angela Merkel is being criticized for running a boring election campaign. It may be part of a cunning plan to win by deterring opposition supporters from voting….
Making the campaign dull stems from the calculation that it can pay off for politicians if as few people as possible bother to vote. It sounds cynical but it works, and this can be proven. It’s an illusion that all political campaigners want a high turnout. What counts is who actually goes to vote.”
Never say it’s dull around here, though:
The headline really says it all, but go ahead and read the story anyway. And then bookmark AlterNet, please.
And finally, when we’re so concerned about where our federal and state money is being spent, should we really be spending money to arrest and prosecute citizens who enjoy the occasional spliff? Because really, can you throw that stone? (heh. She said “stone.” heh.)
“41 percent of the U.S. population say they’ve tried cannabis at least once in their lives, 10 percent say they’ve used it in the last year.”