Rachel Maddow: The ceiling continues to crack, as a woman again overachieves to reach the same level of recognition

2008 August 21

By now, you’ve probably heard that Rachel Maddow will have her own show on MSNBC beginning Sept. 8, in the 9 p.m. timeslot. Maddow has been around for a while, including hosting a program on Air America. But she recently has gained much public favor for taking over the reigns of “Countdown” when Keith Olbermann went on vacation. We all felt she was a wonderful relief form Olbermann’s rantings, and there’s a reason for that. You see, uh, to put it bluntly, she knows what’s she talking about. Because Maddow, unlike Olbermann, has a background in politics. In fact, she is a Rhodes Scholar!. And what? She has a PhD. From Oxford University.

But she was only offered a primetime show after successfully “proving herself” by subbing for Keith Olbermann, the former sportscaster. Yeah, let that sink in for a moment.

Another woman who is highly respected, and also the object of much affection at the House of Jello, is Amy Walter. She writes a column for the National Journal, appears regularly on CNN and on The Newshour with Jim Lehrer (PBS). She’s been a panelist and commentator on Face the Nation (CBS), Meet the Press (NBC), and Washington Journal (C-SPAN). And oh, that’s right, she’s also an adjunct professor at American University in Washington, DC. Maybe someday Amy Walter will get to lead her own show, as well.

These two women are the real deal. They are experts. Yet it has taken this long for them to get the same network recognition as the Laura Ingrahams and Nancy Graces of the world. (Don’t tell me Nancy Grace is an “expert.” She’s also a nutjob. That cancels out any expertise she may have in matters of the law.)

So if anyone is still wondering why I still resent that Hillary Clinton was pushed aside by the Democratic party even though she was clearly the more qualified candidate, even though she proved that again and again by being held to tougher standards that always shifted, maybe you can see by the examples of these two highly intelligent, professional, hardworking women. It just gets a little tiresome to work twice as hard to get to the same point as men.

Working twice as hard, and yes, enduring insults along the way. Yesterday Rush Limbaugh described it as a “shame” that Dan Abrahams was losing his 9 pm timeslot: “He’s losing his show to somebody with more testosterone than he has.”

It’s exciting. And very, very tiresome.


11 Responses leave one →
  1. 2008 August 21

    Men like Limbaugh fear lesbians, in the same way they fear gay men. That’s the basis for his bigotry and hatred.

    And he also hates because a strong woman like Maddow could intellectually eat his lunch and make him watch while she did it.

    I am so pleased to hear about this hire. Maddow is smart, witty, and she doesn’t have to use snark and spite to make a point, and make it bite.

    I can’t wait for her first show.

  2. 2008 August 21

    I am so glad that Dr. Maddow has finally gotten a show. I will be glad to hear some unapologetic liberal views for a change.

  3. 2008 August 21
    Sherry permalink

    This is the second place I’ve heard about Rachel Maddow today. I alerted hubby who controls the TIVO to check look for her show. Thanks for the heads up.

    The issue of the ocntinuing misogyny is one that is ongoing in this house for sure. Hubby is a very liberal leaning guy who firmly believes that women should have every equality afforded them,yet he too is but a man, and cannot wrap his head around the basic unfairness so many women still see. Sigh.

  4. 2008 August 21

    Sherry, I think sometimes it’s hard to see if it you’ve never felt it.

  5. 2008 August 21

    The Hillary Clinton campaign demonstrated to me that gender bias trumps racism in this country. We haven’t come a long enough way yet, baby.

  6. 2008 August 22
    donald permalink

    i waa very pleased to hear rachael will be hosting her own show. i have been a total admirer of her work for some time. rush can’t hold a candle to her! he is such a weenie!

  7. 2008 August 22

    I was really happy to hear this as well. I caught her on Countdown the other night where Keith was talking to her about her upcoming show. I’m really looking forward to her show. I enjoyed her hosting of Countdown very much.

  8. 2008 August 22

    I’m so glad she’s getting this show in time for the November elections, and I hope she will be a regular commentator for the conventions. As Quaker Dave says, she says witty comments without the snark — I don’t know how she does it, but I gotta admire it!

  9. 2008 October 31
    Vincent permalink

    I wouldn’t call this an unfair case of discrimination… Olbermann gives a knowledgeable commentary and has a background in television anchoring that is formidable, whether or not it be in politics. I enjoy his style and his harsh, hammer down delivery of truth on misrepresented issues. He’s good at what he does, so having Maddow sub for him was a great way to give her a go at the job, and she proved herself as being competent. She didn’t need to do anything severe or extreme to get the job… she just did it.

    That aside, I’m extravagantly joyful to see Maddow on MSNBC. Her cometary is witty, hard hitting, and she doesn’t have an ounce of shame in her position. Her confidence and drive make her all the better in her work, which benefits us all.

  10. 2009 March 8
    Quaran permalink

    Nice looking dude that Maddow.

  11. 2009 March 9

    Aren’t you clever, Quaran.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS